juan_gandhi: (Default)
Juan-Carlos Gandhi ([personal profile] juan_gandhi) wrote2012-07-14 12:06 pm

wisdoms

"The 11 in C++11 refers to the number of legs nailed onto the dog whilst attempting to build a better octopus." - Dylan Beattie

[identity profile] vaddimka.livejournal.com 2012-07-15 04:13 am (UTC)(link)
it won't be dead unless the computers suddenly become 100+ times faster and memory cheaper
and even then, when processing power would seem to be in abundance, people will find some use cases for which it won't be enough :)
C++ can be replaced by some equally high-performance language, but one surely has to drop the idea of immutable data for that. for now, anyway
do you see any contenders? given that a language has to be around for what, like 10 years to be considered an industry standard? i honestly do not believe that we will see C++ dead any time soon

[identity profile] ivan-gandhi.livejournal.com 2012-07-15 04:23 am (UTC)(link)
I see quantum computers, linear logic, lenses.
stas: (Don't panic!)

[personal profile] stas 2012-07-15 07:14 am (UTC)(link)
I knew one guy that was sure we'd have flying cars in 5-10 years.