![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
juan_gandhi"The 11 in C++11 refers to the number of legs nailed onto the dog whilst attempting to build a better octopus." - Dylan Beattie
juan_gandhijuan_gandhi
Page Summary
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
Active Entries
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by timeasmymeasure
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2012-07-14 07:20 pm (UTC)Надо отдать должное: одноимённый Ватком был на редкость удачным, имхо.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-14 09:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-14 11:19 pm (UTC)it's still the best choice if you need top-notch performance without the need to deal with memory manually
committee is just trying to keep language up to date (more or less), it's still better than stagnation
no subject
Date: 2012-07-14 11:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-15 04:13 am (UTC)and even then, when processing power would seem to be in abundance, people will find some use cases for which it won't be enough :)
C++ can be replaced by some equally high-performance language, but one surely has to drop the idea of immutable data for that. for now, anyway
do you see any contenders? given that a language has to be around for what, like 10 years to be considered an industry standard? i honestly do not believe that we will see C++ dead any time soon
no subject
Date: 2012-07-15 04:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-15 07:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-15 07:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-15 06:45 am (UTC)That comment is BS.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-15 05:24 pm (UTC)имхо, лучший вариант - С с классами, хде наследование не используецца, а шаблоны ограничены стл контейнерами
ну то есть то, что не влияет на перформанс, но даёт некоторое удобство
no subject
Date: 2012-07-15 06:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-16 07:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-07-16 08:29 am (UTC)