![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
talking about functions in Haskell
Jul. 5th, 2018 01:49 pmon SO
TLDR: there's no way you can define in set theory a function that does not return a result. (Actually you can, but then the whole sets axiomatics should be overhauled.)
TLDR: there's no way you can define in set theory a function that does not return a result. (Actually you can, but then the whole sets axiomatics should be overhauled.)
