So you aren't even critically analysing what's being said to you. That's a symptom - a symptom that you aren't being rational; just spiteful.
Because I've mentioned what that example is about. The example is interesting not because of what it is, but how one arrives at the answer for the question posed.
"знать"
You still have three options: wait for trillions of years, apply intuitionistic logic, or who-yuck into production. I don't know which one of these you do, but the only banal ones are the first and the last option. Or you have the fourth option that nobody else knows about, although it should be banal. It's really unobvious what is hidden behind your "знать".
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2018-08-06 05:12 pm (UTC)So you aren't even critically analysing what's being said to you. That's a symptom - a symptom that you aren't being rational; just spiteful.
Because I've mentioned what that example is about. The example is interesting not because of what it is, but how one arrives at the answer for the question posed.
"знать"
You still have three options: wait for trillions of years, apply intuitionistic logic, or who-yuck into production. I don't know which one of these you do, but the only banal ones are the first and the last option. Or you have the fourth option that nobody else knows about, although it should be banal. It's really unobvious what is hidden behind your "знать".
But you prefer to be non-constructive.