Date: 2008-03-15 12:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cema.livejournal.com
This one is easy. (To read. I wonder how long it took to develop it!)

Date: 2008-03-15 02:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spamsink.livejournal.com
Screw those high resolution monitors! I had to get very close to the screen to read it.

Date: 2008-03-15 05:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] i-ronin.livejournal.com
source: http://www.patryshev.com/monad/m-intro.html
output:

thing about elementury. I find two reasy in category the talking about use, no
good enough to categories, then we defind two reasons for the to defind fused
n categories of view, everythis:

* lace a monads in programminology authors carefully bypass and two reasy i
t of then proach that if you approgramming about element monads in categories,
hen give some basic examplifier.



This:



This crash course some basic examplifier.

I am sure the monad, the monads in proach to reasons for then give stary. I fin
two reasy in categories.



This crash category the cention to categories any authors, that if you approgra
ming languages.

* lace a functors, then give stary. I find fuse, not good enough to be talki
g seem to be talking with an easy in programminology authout elementury. I find
two replack of view, everythis:



This categorical point of monads in carefully bypass any authors category that
f you approach then proach to be then give stary. I fine a fused int monad, the
ry;
* languages.

* lack of monadic from calculus. Good enough topic examplifier.

It's like the cent of monad, the to design any ment mysterming about electrical
ulus. Good enough theory then give starts will look almost mysterming with care
ully bypass any as using lack of carefully bypass and two reasons for thing see
to define a most mysterming lack of familiarity with and two replack of thing
eem to cal point of monadic terious notion of then give some basic from categor
this crash categories of then give some basic terious not good enough to be th
then give starts with and two reasons for this:

* lack of monads in programming with carefully bypass and two replack of cat
gory then programming languages.



This crash course some basic terminology authout using languages.



I amples and two replace a monads in programming with any as using seem to be t
be then we define a monad, the monads in categories.

It's like talking seem to carefully bypass and funct

Date: 2008-03-15 11:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] faceted-jacinth.livejournal.com
Картинка не грузица!!!!111одинодин

Date: 2008-03-16 11:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ikadell.livejournal.com
... and let the life drive you crazy...

Profile

juan_gandhi: (Default)
Juan-Carlos Gandhi

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    1 2 3
456 7 8 9 10
11 121314151617
181920 21 222324
25 262728 2930 31

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 1st, 2025 08:12 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios