Martha Stewart questions
Mar. 8th, 2004 03:58 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
juan_gandhiI just have a couple of angry questions.
So, if President Bush lies to the people, and thousands get killed, it is okay, is not it? Unlike when Martha lies to the investigators.
So, if investigators lie to Martha Stewart, is it perfectly okay, but it is only illegal to lie to the investigators, is it not?
Does Martha have a lawyer or something? If she does, why did not she "take five" - then she could have the right not to talk about her alleged "broker tip"?
Now, that broker, Bakanovic, or whatever is his name - where did he get this information? From FDA? Is there anybody in FDA that is going to go to prison for disclosing this kind of information? Was not there a bribe involved?
And, talking about FDA - why is it so bad and illegal to bring from Canada the same drugs from the same manufacturer - they are FDA-approved, are not they? - while it is okay to advertise and prescribe and sell drugs that are not FDA-approved, and are even known to be dangerous? I am talking about Paxil and Zoloft. Are not there there any incentives and "tips" involved?
I think, it is all rather about FDA, not Martha.
So, if President Bush lies to the people, and thousands get killed, it is okay, is not it? Unlike when Martha lies to the investigators.
So, if investigators lie to Martha Stewart, is it perfectly okay, but it is only illegal to lie to the investigators, is it not?
Does Martha have a lawyer or something? If she does, why did not she "take five" - then she could have the right not to talk about her alleged "broker tip"?
Now, that broker, Bakanovic, or whatever is his name - where did he get this information? From FDA? Is there anybody in FDA that is going to go to prison for disclosing this kind of information? Was not there a bribe involved?
And, talking about FDA - why is it so bad and illegal to bring from Canada the same drugs from the same manufacturer - they are FDA-approved, are not they? - while it is okay to advertise and prescribe and sell drugs that are not FDA-approved, and are even known to be dangerous? I am talking about Paxil and Zoloft. Are not there there any incentives and "tips" involved?
I think, it is all rather about FDA, not Martha.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2004-03-09 06:44 am (UTC)Food and Drug Administration's approval to market its antidepressant Paxil for treating general anxiety disorder, a new use for the drug.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-09 08:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-09 09:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-09 11:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-10 12:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-10 05:38 am (UTC)